|
Co-GMs
Sept 3, 2009 23:56:45 GMT -5
Post by PR's Old Account (DO NOT PM) on Sept 3, 2009 23:56:45 GMT -5
I hate them, but its your league, and don't let my opinions influence you. If you love co-GMs and want to Co-GM or allow others to co-GM, vote yes. Reminder: both Co-GMs have equal power, and as such each individual is treated as the sole GM for things such as trade-accepts, re-signing negotiations, etc. If your co-GM over pays someone, you get to co-suck-it-up. This includes removing your Co-GM if you accept one. You guys are a team until one of you resigns. Similarly, to avoid this sounding biased, if you have limited time and are ok with this and want extra help, etc. Yay co-GMs...
|
|
|
Co-GMs
Sept 4, 2009 17:23:46 GMT -5
Post by extreme on Sept 4, 2009 17:23:46 GMT -5
I think it's stupid. How much time do you really need to run a team thats not even real?
|
|
|
Co-GMs
Sept 4, 2009 19:09:54 GMT -5
Post by xx - Former Penguins-xx on Sept 4, 2009 19:09:54 GMT -5
1 word.
POINTLESS.
|
|
|
Co-GMs
Sept 4, 2009 19:47:09 GMT -5
Post by New York Rangers on Sept 4, 2009 19:47:09 GMT -5
They would help other members get used to the league before a team becomes available so that we don't have retards in the league.
|
|
|
Co-GMs
Sept 4, 2009 21:14:12 GMT -5
Post by PR's Old Account (DO NOT PM) on Sept 4, 2009 21:14:12 GMT -5
They would help other members get used to the league before a team becomes available so that we don't have retards in the league. But if they are retards, do you want to give them co-full power over your team?
|
|