|
|
Post by foreign on Sept 7, 2009 18:40:25 GMT -5
I say we move on from this league and build another one. We've already established the ideas. We can move on. Also, this league wouldn't feel the same without Mike. Let's go on to the next game but with the same ideas.  |
|
|
|
Post by Personnel Representative on Sept 7, 2009 18:41:37 GMT -5
just to be clear, any sort of relaunch, or ManNHL 2.0 will be here, not on a whole new site. No one has the time to rebuild this, and I kinda want to keep our history.
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Penguins-xx on Sept 7, 2009 18:41:52 GMT -5
Couldn't have said it better myself Blues.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2009 18:53:46 GMT -5
I'm up for the Switch, It will probably be for the best
BTW When are we inducting Mikey into the HoF?
|
|
|
|
Post by extreme on Sept 7, 2009 19:04:54 GMT -5
just to be clear, any sort of relaunch, or ManNHL 2.0 will be here, not on a whole new site. No one has the time to rebuild this, and I kinda want to keep our history. Just throw all the posts into a created sub-forum. |
|
|
|
Post by home on Sept 7, 2009 20:10:56 GMT -5
I wouldnt mind starting fresh as long as the older gm's(who have been here the longest) get to choose first on new teams. PS that coming from me and my team is pretty sick  |
|
|
|
Post by home on Sept 7, 2009 21:01:40 GMT -5
Is leafs still gona stay though?, He doesnt have to sim he is still a good gm and being just a GM isnt all that time consuming.
|
|
|
|
Post by Winnipeg Jets on Sept 7, 2009 21:42:11 GMT -5
No Leafs is making a new league, he has no interest in coming back.
|
|
|
|
Post by home on Sept 7, 2009 21:52:15 GMT -5
alright messenger boy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Winnipeg Jets on Sept 7, 2009 22:13:01 GMT -5
Well someone has to be considering Leafs is banned, commenter "boy".
|
|
|
|
Post by islesfan90 on Sept 8, 2009 0:49:01 GMT -5
I'm good either way, I just want this league to continue.
|
|
|
|
Post by xx - Former Blues-xx on Sept 20, 2009 20:23:19 GMT -5
mannhl 2.0,a fresh start,more acvtive mebers...
|
|
