|
|
Post by battery on Mar 6, 2008 12:30:19 GMT -5
Lucic (79)
Esposito (79)
Philly 1st 08
Tor 2nd 08
NYR 2nd 08
Philly 2nd 08
I accept.
|
|
|
|
Post by PR's Old Account (DO NOT PM) on Mar 6, 2008 12:36:21 GMT -5
That's some SERIOUS draft value. But I think its fitting since the primary admin had all these picks BEFORE stating the draft means that he give up some. In my books that shows a solid admin. Cause otherwise the guy has a rookie at about...fucking.....96?? Wow....
|
|
|
|
Post by battery on Mar 6, 2008 12:38:22 GMT -5
Oh. Yeah.  He offered it to me, too, so I'm thinking this is a fair trade, since these 2 will go up in stats too. Basically the picks = 75+3+3+3 = an 84 player for next year, and these 2 prospect = 81-83 players next year |
|
|
|
Post by PR's Old Account (DO NOT PM) on Mar 6, 2008 12:40:51 GMT -5
and thats JUST what is being seen here. with other draft picks, it could amount to A LOT, (same with Espo and Lucic) so it's pretty even.
|
|
|
|
Post by battery on Mar 6, 2008 12:53:31 GMT -5
haha, without these picks, I could draft a player whos 82 if my 1st ISNT in the top 5. if Philly's pick ISNT either, the player I pick is going to be a 96. If he is in the top 5, well then, I don't know what i'll do.. Seeing as I can't put them all on 1 player because the player would be at 101! LOL!
|
|
|
|
Post by xx-Former Avalanche-xx on Mar 6, 2008 13:39:55 GMT -5
I'm usually not daft, but I don't understand how this draft pick thing works.  |
|
|
|
Post by PR's Old Account (DO NOT PM) on Mar 6, 2008 13:45:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Personnel Representative on Mar 6, 2008 22:09:04 GMT -5
i accept.
|
|
|
|
Post by mattyh on Mar 7, 2008 12:26:04 GMT -5
accept
|
|
He offered it to me, too, so I'm thinking this is a fair trade, since these 2 will go up in stats too. Basically the picks = 75+3+3+3 = an 84 player for next year, and these 2 prospect = 81-83 players next year
