|
|
Post by xx - Former Stars on May 6, 2011 21:25:50 GMT -5
I dont like how I have two star centers in Richards and Eric Staal. Ive decided to keep Richards, and entertain offers on Staal.
I prefer youth. PM offers please
|
|
|
|
Post by mattyh on May 6, 2011 21:27:11 GMT -5
Maybe Nashville will go after Eric Staal, he has been trying to get Kopitar off me for awhile now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on May 6, 2011 21:28:48 GMT -5
Grabovski
Three first round picks in 2011 for Staal
|
|
|
|
Post by mattyh on May 6, 2011 21:29:57 GMT -5
I got Leafs beat Joey Crabb for Eric Staal and a 1st lol  |
|
|
|
Post by Nashville Predators on May 6, 2011 21:31:08 GMT -5
Maybe Nashville will go after Eric Staal, he has been trying to get Kopitar off me for awhile now. Haha, I did and was going for Kopitar. Only reason I made an offer was because you offered first.  But, I have Lecavalier now. I wouldn't be against a Staal deal, not sure I have what it takes though, for what is available. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2011 21:31:57 GMT -5
Grabovski Three first round picks in 2011 for Staal Clearly says to PM offers, You Lose..... Idiots. |
|
|
|
Post by mattyh on May 6, 2011 21:33:08 GMT -5
Grabovski Three first round picks in 2011 for Staal Three firsts wow, crazy leaf gms lol hell of an offer. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2011 21:37:25 GMT -5
If Dallas rejects that, I will kill him
|
|
|
|
Post by Anaheim Ducks on May 6, 2011 21:52:51 GMT -5
If Dallas rejects that, I will kill him The trade would put leafs over the cap by more than the 10% maximum allowed. |
|
|
|
Post by xx-Former Avalanche-xx on May 6, 2011 21:55:26 GMT -5
Ruh roh.....And he woulda gotten away with it too if it werent for those pesky kids.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nashville Predators on May 6, 2011 21:58:44 GMT -5
If Dallas rejects that, I will kill him The trade would put leafs over the cap by more than the 10% maximum allowed. He is also over the roster limit and has players on waivers.. |
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on May 6, 2011 22:07:11 GMT -5
Alright, first of all, no one has to be cap compliant until when rosters have to be submitted (See Schedule). Secondly, we don't have a rule regarding roster limits...?
I'm finding it funny that members are creating more rules as we go than those who actually run the site.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on May 6, 2011 22:08:15 GMT -5
Also, I'd be over the cap by 5M for now, but I have plenty of time to work my way under.
|
|
|
|
Post by XX - Former Jackets - XX on May 6, 2011 22:08:43 GMT -5
He's also got 2 players named Schenn, which isn't allowed, (new rule), so he's going to have to do something there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on May 6, 2011 22:11:25 GMT -5
LMAO
|
|
|
|
Post by Nashville Predators on May 6, 2011 22:13:29 GMT -5
Was defending you, bro.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on May 6, 2011 22:15:46 GMT -5
Gotcha, sorry, misread.
|
|
|
|
Post by Anaheim Ducks on May 6, 2011 22:48:13 GMT -5
I don't know about roster limits, but since we're realistic I'd expect the 10% limit to be in play. Poll possibly? I didnt mean to be a pain in your ass, Mike. Just stated the real NHL rules. |
|
|
|
Post by Florida Panthers on May 6, 2011 22:51:18 GMT -5
He's also got 2 players named Schenn, which isn't allowed, (new rule), so he's going to have to do something there. -Awh, how will Vancouver take this? |
|
|
|
Post by Personnel Representative on May 6, 2011 22:52:27 GMT -5
I don;t think it matters how far over the cap you are at any given time. Its easy to get under quickly with waivers and such.
I think as long as you are under by roster-call, who cares if you go over?
|
|
