Belfour

[Personnel Representative]

Yup...

[Nashville Predators]

What if you don't mind Belfour but don't like the contract.

[Toronto Maple Leafs]

Then you're a ginger kid and have no soul

[Personnel Representative]

May 15, 2011 17:04:41 GMT -5 Nashville Predators said:

What if you don't mind Belfour but don't like the contract.

That was not an option. This poll is simple, and to the point. No gray area allowed.

[Florida Panthers]

I like Belfour, the contract is a little excessive. I said something else twice. As much as I love Belfour, I knew 5 years 5 M is too big .

[Nashville Predators]

Voted 'no'.

I have no problem with it being Belfour. Just think the contract is foolish. Guess if the GM is up for it, so be it. Can only benefit me somehow, $5M on Florida for 5 years, maybe not enough room for Kulikov in the future..

[xx-Former Flyers-xx]

Minus a vote on NO and make it a YES.

My bad. Didn't read it properly.

[Toronto Maple Leafs]

It's now 9-5.

[XX - Former Hawks - XX]

I'm not even gonna explain why this is wrong. I voted Yes.

[Vancouver Canucks]

Let the signing Stand PR already accepted it and now he wants to undo it?. PR I thought you STOOD BY YOUR ACTIONS ISN'T THAT WHAT YOU ALWAYS SAY ??

[xx - Former Penguins-xx]

Don't reverse it, contracts don't get much more realistic than that. 5 years, $25 mil for a guy who hasn't played in the NHL in years and will be 51 when the deal ends. Looks all good to me. /end sarcasm

[Personnel Representative]

May 15, 2011 19:56:22 GMT -5 Vancouver Canucks said:

Let the signing Stand PR already accepted it and now he wants to undo it?. PR I thought you STOOD BY YOUR ACTIONS ISN'T THAT WHAT YOU ALWAYS SAY ??

I still stand by it. The signing page explained my reasons.

[Vancouver Canucks]

May 15, 2011 20:03:51 GMT -5 Personnel Representative said:

May 15, 2011 19:56:22 GMT -5 Vancouver Canucks said:

Let the signing Stand PR already accepted it and now he wants to undo it?. PR I thought you STOOD BY YOUR ACTIONS ISN'T THAT WHAT YOU ALWAYS SAY ??

I still stand by it. The signing page explained my reasons.

Then why do you wanna undo it ? and nice save PR

[Personnel Representative]

I don't. Everyone else was mad, and I am all about the democracy, so let the league decide. Doesn't matter to me in the end if Belfour is here or not.

[Pittsburgh Penguins]

It is guaranteed money for Belfour. Florida get a goalie that he will end up having to use a backup for 5 years for 5mil per season. Will be nice as he losses all his young guys to FA becuase he has no money LOL

[Vancouver Canucks]

in some sense this is like the Kovalchuk signing except 11 of you are siding with the "NHL" and six of us are siding with the NHLPA. I sorta get why the NHLPA sided with Kovalchuk now. But why would you guys vote against it ?you guys aren't spending a single penny on him. If belf wants to sign Belfour to this contract let him do it It's his choice. I'd get pretty ticked if I signed Daniel Sedin to a 8 year 6 M contract and you guys rejected it we don't have a NHL / NHLPHA system here so really this shouldn't be an issue belf wanted to sign him and did end of the story whats with the commotion

[Pittsburgh Penguins]

I just don't want things to continue down this line.

[Anaheim Ducks]

Leave the signing the way it is. It screws over FLA long term. Lets just LEARN from it and move on.

[xx-Former Flyers-xx]

is sedin 46 years old?

[Deleted]

I got convinced, switch my vote from yes to no