|
|
Post by thecrazedcanuck on Feb 23, 2012 22:49:38 GMT -5
Derek Roy C 59 24 22 46
Logan Couture C 59 14 25 39
Dan Boyle D 59 8 26 34
Patrick Thoresen LW 59 18 15 33
for
Steven Stamkos C 52 10 26 36
Mattias Ohlund D 60 5 20 25
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Feb 23, 2012 23:08:24 GMT -5
Salaries please.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston Bruins on Feb 23, 2012 23:13:02 GMT -5
was bored, decided to help:
To Tampa Bay:
2014 RFA C LOGAN COUTURE 2.15 1-WAY
2018 UFA C DEREK ROY 4.85 1-WAY
2015 UFA LW PATRICK THORESEN 3.00 1-WAY
2014 UFA D DAN BOYLE 6.667 1-WAY
To Calgary:
Steven Stamkos C 6.500 UFA 2016
Mattias Ohlund D 3.607 UFA 2016
Tampa Bay gains 6.56M in salary.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Feb 23, 2012 23:22:42 GMT -5
Bolts Cap - Currently at 66.007
-Stamkos and Ohlund contracts = 55.900
+Couture, Roy, Thoresen, Boyle contracts = 72.567M
This trade would put Bolts over the cap by 5.567M, which means in order to be cap compliant, Bolts would have to waive either Dan Boyle immediately, or St. Louis, or a combination of Gagne, Malone, Lombardi, Rachunek plus another player such as Daniel Paille, Chris Kelly, etc.
So while I do think it's a great deal for both sides, the cap circumstances would have to put it on hold while Bolts figures out their cap, and has until tomorrow night at midnight to do so. Given that Bolts has been rather quiet on the trade front until this, I doubt this will happen. That said, players also need to waive contracts in this deal (Ohlund, I believe Roy as well and definitely Boyle). I will be willing to process this deal if Bolts can figure out a way to make his team cap compliant in order to complete it, but I just don't see the point in potentially throwing away talent on the waive wire to do so. Why give up 4 good assets when you can keep them all and make the right moves during the off-season with more time?
Just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Feb 25, 2012 3:11:49 GMT -5
rejected, finalized
|
|
