|
Post by Anaheim Ducks on Apr 7, 2012 22:56:39 GMT -5
To Anaheim:
C Artem Anisimov 1M RFA 2014
To New York:
D Joe Corvo 4.3M UFA 2016
I accept - get younger and get some needed depth at C.
|
|
|
Post by New York Rangers on Apr 7, 2012 23:02:18 GMT -5
I accept.
|
|
|
Post by Personnel Representative on Apr 8, 2012 2:02:54 GMT -5
a) Corvo makes 4.3Mb) Pens would have your ass for that if he saw it. He already thinks you are a cheater. This kinda helps his point. c) And we have yet another re-sign and trade. I want everyone to see this! And remember it when next season, you will be lucky to re-sign half your pending FAs.
|
|
|
Post by Anaheim Ducks on Apr 8, 2012 8:16:11 GMT -5
a) Corvo makes 4.3Mb) Pens would have your ass for that if he saw it. He already thinks you are a cheater. This kinda helps his point. c) And we have yet another re-sign and trade. I want everyone to see this! And remember it when next season, you will be lucky to re-sign half your pending FAs.Sorry about that - I posted the deal from my phone (no copy-pasting), didnt notice the error.
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Apr 8, 2012 10:21:02 GMT -5
Obviously,he won't beable to sign Anisimov. So he get nothing for Corvo
|
|
|
Post by Anaheim Ducks on Apr 8, 2012 10:34:43 GMT -5
Obviously,he won't beable to sign Anisimov. So he get nothing for Corvo I probably have another move coming soon. Dont you worry about me. Plus; he's a RFA - So if he signs a deal elsewhere, I can match or let him go for a bunch of draft picks - either way I don't get 'nothing for Corvo'.
|
|
|
Post by Carolina Hurricanes on Apr 8, 2012 11:53:21 GMT -5
Pens will now be offering him a contract ahhahaha
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver Canucks on Apr 8, 2012 12:19:57 GMT -5
Yeah ducks I didn't really like Corvo's cap hit.I got a lot of Cap space but still that's risky business lol even though he has been consistent since the site relaunched
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Apr 8, 2012 14:52:07 GMT -5
Or maybe nobody offers him a contract and he desides to go to the KHL as he doesn't like Ducks bussiness practises LOL. Just an idea.
|
|
|
Post by Anaheim Ducks on Apr 8, 2012 19:00:49 GMT -5
Yeah ducks I didn't really like Corvo's cap hit.I got a lot of Cap space but still that's risky business lol even though he has been consistent since the site relaunched How does this make any sense? lol. If he's been consistent, then how is it risky? Please explain, I'm very interested. lol.
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver Canucks on Apr 8, 2012 19:10:10 GMT -5
It's cause for some reason players produce on your team but in my team players have a hard time producing. I also didn't like the fact he was signed for 2 years
|
|
|
Post by Anaheim Ducks on Apr 8, 2012 19:16:21 GMT -5
It's cause for some reason players produce on your team but in my team players have a hard time producing. I also didn't like the fact he was signed for 2 years Not true - I've had players that were average and below average.. I just found ways to either a) move them or b) get them to produce. I'm sure Corvo will do more than fine elsewhere. Also - please reply to my PM. lol.
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Apr 9, 2012 0:04:00 GMT -5
Guys the reason some players produce on some teams and not on others is becuase half the teams are playing 3 lines. So you have 3 lines getting 1st line minutes. If this sim system had injuires to skaters and not just golaies they would be dropping like flies. I will be changing my team to play 3 lines this year as well. With no injuries. Why not?
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver Canucks on Apr 9, 2012 0:09:36 GMT -5
But in all honesty I would like to see a lot more production from players. 40-60 points is considered amazing that has to change
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Apr 9, 2012 2:59:36 GMT -5
The three lines thing is completely not true at all, Pens has no idea what he's talking about. Every team played four lines, but sometimes the fourth line ndidn't play often at all, but that was due to A. chemistry and B. lack of talent. That is all.
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Apr 9, 2012 7:24:03 GMT -5
there was a bunch of teams that there 4 line players played 0:04 minutes per game. All that had to do was make sure they had 5 Centers playing, or 7 Defenseman and you were guaranteed that the 4 line would not play at all. Had nothing to do with skill. Just put an odd player in the lineup.
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Apr 9, 2012 14:42:06 GMT -5
Has nothing to do with playing 5 centers or anything like that.
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Apr 9, 2012 15:07:32 GMT -5
When I noticed the other teams playing 3 lines. I went and made it so I would have 7 defenseman playing, and then my team was only playing 3 lines as well. I noticed that is what a few teams did and it worked for me.
|
|