|
|
Post by Boston Bruins on Oct 31, 2012 8:05:01 GMT -5
Still makes no sense to me based on what I said before. Trading a 1st liner for a 3rd and 4th liner. huh? Hodgson with 30 points is a 4th liner? Looks like a 1st/2nd liner and a prospect for a 2nd liner and a 2nd/3rd liner to me. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2012 18:29:38 GMT -5
lol MacArthur isn't a 1st liner.... Hodgson and MaxPac is are 2nd liners
2nd liner and a prospect for 2nd liner, and a 2nd liner
What's so hard to get. PR your making a big stick out of nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Carolina Hurricanes on Oct 31, 2012 18:39:26 GMT -5
Its a 1st liner and a prospect for two middle six forwards.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2012 19:24:12 GMT -5
if MacArthur is a 1st liner, then so is Pacioretty
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Nov 4, 2012 14:30:33 GMT -5
Deal Officially Rejected, Finalized
|
|
|
|
Post by Personnel Representative on Nov 4, 2012 22:38:02 GMT -5
lol MacArthur isn't a 1st liner.... Hodgson and MaxPac is are 2nd liners 2nd liner and a prospect for 2nd liner, and a 2nd liner What's so hard to get. PR your making a big stick out of nothing. Because you are looking at this from YOUR team. I looked at it from PHOENIX'S team. On HIS team, you are giving him guys who would barely crack his 3rd and 4th line. He has depth, and didn't need this trade. |
|
