|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on May 9, 2011 20:46:49 GMT -5
NOTE: FOR YOU TO PLACE AN OFFER SHEET FOR AN RFA, YOU MUST HAVE YOUR OWN PICKS TO USE AS COMPENSATION.
$1,000,000 or below = No Compensation
$1,000,001 to $1,600,000 = 2nd Round Pick
$1,600,001 to $3,000,000 = 1st Round Pick
$3,000,001 to $4,500,000 = 1st and 2nd Round Pick
$4,500,001 to $6,000,000 = Two 1st Round Picks and a 2nd Round Pick
$6,000,001 to $7,500,000 = Three 1st Round Picks
$7,500,001 and over = Four 1st Round Picks
|
|
|
|
Post by Personnel Representative on May 10, 2011 2:30:59 GMT -5
I modified this because the real NHL numbers were stupid and messy.
|
|
|
|
Post by XX - Former Wings - XX on May 10, 2011 9:27:31 GMT -5
I swear that 4.9 was for 1st and second, can you round that to 5, instead of diminishing it to 4.5?
|
|
|
|
Post by Nashville Predators on May 10, 2011 10:48:12 GMT -5
Will we be using the no trading of a matched offersheet rule?
If you match an offersheet and you MUST keep that player for at least one year before he is eligible to be traded.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on May 10, 2011 13:04:44 GMT -5
I'll let PR make that call, but I think there's two things to consider:
1. Teams must become cap compliant no matter their decisions, and unless the offer sheet has the NTC/NMC involved, it doesn't matter.
2. Teams have the right to trade anyone they want to, and if that means it's an RFA they hoped to keep so be it.
3. Sign and trade I guess does come into effect and it doesn't look good, but it happens.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nashville Predators on May 10, 2011 13:53:48 GMT -5
It's a real NHL rule was just wondering if it takes place here.
Hjalmarsson is one example.
|
|
|
|
Post by Personnel Representative on May 10, 2011 14:05:24 GMT -5
Yeah, we'll use the one year, no trade on the matched offer sheets. It makes sense, and I don't see any reason to get rid of it.
|
|
